With the Public
Copyright Consultations moving full steam ahead, various stake-holders raise proposals for expanding
the scope of collective administration of copyright. This trend is not new. Over the past two decades or so, collective
administration of copyright has been touted as a solution to many of the ills
of the copyright system and to many of the legal challenges brought about by
the encounter between copyrights and the digital realm. It has been viewed as
the magic bullet that bridges the unfortunate trade-off between incentive and
access; a mechanism that allows both rewarding creators and unfettered access
to works. And indeed, while not at all a new phenomenon - music performing
rights have been administered collectively in many countries for most of the
20th century - collective administration has recently proliferated across many
other areas of copyright, often with enthusiasm.
I have recently completed a paper that offers a less
enthusiastic account of this trend. The paper examines several types of
collective administration and argues that with rare exceptions, the various
justifications for collective administration are too weak to justify departure
from the competitive paradigm that underlies market economies. It suggests that
in most cases collusion and rent-seeking mainly drive the formation of
copyright collectives, and suspects that only rarely such rent-seeking may be
justified as a matter of policy, either as a way to improve the incentives to
create socially valuable works or on distributional grounds.
I presented an earlier draft of the paper at the NYU Engelberg Center's 2007
conference at La Pietra, Florence, and the revised version will
appear as a book chapter in a forthcoming book: Working Within the Boundaries
of Intellectual Property Law (Harry First, Rochelle Dreyfuss, and Diane
Zimmerman, eds., Oxford University Press).
The paper can be freely downloaded from
here.
That's right, this copyright issue has been an event for many years. Thanks for the link of your paper, and i congratulate you for it's release.
Posted by: Law School | August 17, 2009 at 09:09 AM