« Canadian Anti-Terror Law on Trial | Main | Dealing with Dual Citizenship »

June 29, 2006

Three views on Leskun v. Leskun

Three University of Toronto faculty members, each an expert in family law, have written commentaries in three different newspapers, on three consecutive days, about the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision Leskun v. Leskun. Each faculty member takes a different perspective on the decision.

Brenda Cossman, National Post: "Cheaters beware"

Carol Rogerson,The Globe and Mail: "Divorce ruling is far from faulty"

Martha Shaffer, Toronto Star: "Top court muddies divorce law"

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/718034/5218804

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Three views on Leskun v. Leskun:

» Blawg Review # 65 from What About Clients?
We live in a world that never sleeps. Most mornings, lawyers at my firm get e-mails from people in all manner of time zones: Hanjo in Bonn, Michael in London, Giulio in Rome, Paul in Cardiff, Angel in Madrid,... [Read More]

» Blawg Review # 65 from What About Clients?
We live in a world that never sleeps. Most mornings, lawyers at my firm get e-mails from people in all manner of time zones: Hanjo in Bonn, Michael in London, Giulio in Rome, Paul in Cardiff, Angel in Madrid,... [Read More]

» Blawg Review # 65 from What About Clients?
We live in a world that never sleeps. Most mornings, lawyers at my firm get e-mails from people in all manner of time zones: Hanjo in Bonn, Michael in London, Giulio in Rome, Paul in Cardiff, Angel in Madrid,... [Read More]

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Comment Policy


Powered by Rollyo
Blog powered by TypePad